Efficacy  >  KarMMa-3 Results

PFS by Subgroups

Quality of Life

ABECMA® Delivered Durability in a Difficult-to-Treat Population

Demonstrated superior PFS vs 5 standard regimens after 2L treatment1,2

 

3x longer mPFS with ABECMA

mPFS at final analysis at 30.9 months of follow-up2,3*

13.8 months

(95% CI, 11.8-16.1)
ABECMA

vs

4.4 months

(95% CI, 3.4-5.8)
Standard regimens

HR=0.49 (95% CI, 0.38-0.63)

51% reduced risk of disease progression or death with ABECMA
vs standard regimens (ITT population)3

  • Patients in the control arm received the following therapies: DPd (33%), EPd (24%), Kd (22%), IRd (16%), DVd (6%)4

 

>8x higher ≥CR rate with ABECMA2†

Final analysis at 30.9 months of follow-up

44% CR rate

with ABECMA vs 5% with standard regimens 

mPFS with ≥CR

24.4 months5

71% ORR/61% ≥VGPR

with ABECMA vs 43%/17% with standard regimens6

  • In the ABECMA arm, the mDOR was 14.8 months (95% CI, 12.0, 18.6) in patients with PR or better. In those patients with CR or better, the mDOR was 20 months (95% Cl, 15.8. 24.3)1

*Primary PFS analysis: Median PFS of 13.3 months (95% Cl, 11.8-16.1) with ABECMA vs 4.4 months with standard regimens (95% Cl, 3.4-5.9); HR=0.49 (95% CI, 0.38-0.64); P<0.0001 at 15.9 months of follow- up. Response data at primary analysis (median follow-up of 15.9 months): ABECMA 71% (n=181) ORR, 60% (n=153) ≥VGPR, 39% (n=98) ≥CR vs standard regimens 42% (n=55) ORR, 15% (n=20) ≥VGPR, 5% (n=7) ≥CR. The primary efficacy analysis was performed on the ITT population of all randomized patients. For patients randomized to the ABECMA arm (n=254), this included 24 patients who were leukapheresed but did not receive ABECMA. For patients randomized to the standard regimens arm (n=132), this included 6 patients who did not receive treatment.1,7
The KarMMa-3 trial was not powered to evaluate differences in CR rates; therefore, such results are not statistically significant and should be interpreted with caution and the significance of such difference is not known.1

mDOR=median duration of response; PR=partial response; VGPR=very good partial response.

Identify your
ABECMA-eligible patients

Start the ABECMA process faster than
ever—find a certified treatment
center near you

References:

1. ABECMA [package insert]. Summit, NJ: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; 2025. 2. Rodriguez-Otero P. Idecabtagene vicleucel versus standard regimens in patients with triple-class-exposed relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: updated analysis from KarMMa-3. Presented at: 65th ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition; December 9-12, 2023; San Diego, CA. 3. Rodriguez Otero P, Ailawadhi S, Arnulf B. Idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) versus standard (std) regimens in patients (pts) with triple-class–exposed (TCE) relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): updated analysis from KarMMa-3. Abstract presented at: 65th ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition; December 9-12, 2023; San Diego, CA. 4. Rodriguez-Otero P, Ailawadhi S, Arnulf B, et al. Ide-cel or standard regimens in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(11):1002-1014. Supplementary Appendix. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2213614 5. Data on file. BMS-REF-IDC-0052. Princeton, NJ: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; 2025. 6. Data on file. Table 14.2.2.1.1. Princeton, NJ: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; June 2023. 7. Rodriguez-Otero P, Ailawadhi S, Arnulf B, et al. Ide-cel or standard regimens in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(11):1002–1014. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2213614




Legal Notice  |  Privacy Policy  |  Your Privacy Choices  |  Site Map  |  Contact Us  


© 2026 Bristol-Myers Squibb Company.
ABECMA, Cell Therapy 360, and the related logos are trademarks of Celgene Corporation, a Bristol Myers Squibb company. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. 2012-US-2500247 03/26