Unmet Need  >  Patient Characteristics

Triple-Class Exposed Patients

Could More Patients Benefit From CAR T Treatment in Earlier Lines of RRMM?

Patients may be overlooked for specific CAR T treatments and prioritized for other modalities because of a range of factors1-5:

  • Advanced age
  • Poor performance status
  • Certain comorbidities (such as CNS disease or cardiovascular disease)
  • Renal status
  • Concerns about manufacturing/timing (especially for fast-progressive patients)
  • Concerns about long-term safety

All CAR T cell therapies have their own specific risk/benefit profile.
Choose the most appropriate treatment option for each of your patients.

There are no head-to-head studies between bispecifics and CAR T cell therapies in RRMM. Therefore, direct comparisons should not be made or inferred.
*Patients who have received an immunomodulatory agent, a PI, and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody.6
CAR=chimeric antigen receptor; CNS=central nervous system; PI=proteasome inhibitor; RRMM=relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. 

See more data for
triple–class exposed* patients

Find a certified
treatment center near you

References:

1. Jaggers JL, Giri S, Klepin HD, et al. Characterizing inclusion and exclusion criteria in clinical trials for chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy among adults with hematologic malignancies. J Geriatr Oncol. 2021;12(2):235–238. doi:10.1016/j.jgo.2020.08.004 2. Shah N, Aiello J, Avigan DE, et al. The Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer consensus statement on immunotherapy for the treatment of multiple myeloma. J Immunother Cancer. 2020;8(2):e000734. doi:10.1136/jitc-2020-000734 3. Ahmed N, Wesson W, Mushtaq MU, et al. “Waitlist mortality” is high for myeloma patients with limited access to BCMA therapy. Front Oncol. 2023;13:1206715. doi:10.3389/fonc.2023.1206715 4. Zhang X, Zhao J, Zhao Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of B-cell maturation antigen–targeting CAR-T cell therapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1166572. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2023.1166572 5. The Lancet Haematology. CAR T-cell therapy: navigating real-world challenges beyond clinical trials. Lancet Haematol. 2025;12(4):e231. doi:10.1016/S2352-3026(24)00377-6 6. ABECMA [package insert]. Summit, NJ: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; 2025. 7. Rodriguez-Otero P, Alawadhi S, Arnulf B, et al. Ide-cel or standard regimens in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(11):1002–1014. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2213614 8. Wang PF, Yee CW, Gorsh B, et al. Treatment patterns and overall survival of patients with double-class and triple-class refractory multiple myeloma: A US electronic health record database study. Leuk Lymphoma. 2023;64(2):398-406. doi:10.1080/10428194.2022.2140284 9. Stalker ME, Mark TM. Clinical management of triple-class refractory multiple myeloma: a review of current strategies and emerging therapies. Curr Oncol. 2022;29(7):4464–4477. doi:10.3390/curroncol29070355 10. Dimopoulos MA, Richardson P, Lonial S. Treatment options for patients with heavily pretreated relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2022;22(7):460–473. doi:10.1016/j.clml.2022.01.011 11. Mateos M-V, Weisel K, De Stefano V, et al. LocoMMotion: a prospective, non-interventional, multinational study of real-life current standards of care in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2022;36(5):1371-1376. doi:10.1038/s41375-022-01531-2




Legal Notice  |  Privacy Policy  |  Your Privacy Choices  |  Site Map  |  Contact Us  


© 2026 Bristol-Myers Squibb Company.
ABECMA, Cell Therapy 360, and the related logos are trademarks of Celgene Corporation, a Bristol Myers Squibb company. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. 2012-US-2500247 03/26