Trial Design  >  KarMMa-3 Trial

Patient Characteristics

Patient Eligibility

KarMMa-3 Brings the Opportunity of ABECMA® to Triple-Class Exposed* Patients Earlier in Their Treatment Journey1-3

KarMMa-3 trial design in RRMM 3L+ patients. All patients were triple-class exposed. Inclusion criteria for the study included that patients has received 2-4 prior treatment regimens, including an immunomodulatory agent, a PL, and daratumumab. Patients were refractory to their last regimen. Clinical fitness (e.g. good performance status and adequate organ functioning) was considered. The sample size was n=386. n=254 received Abecma, and n=132 received a standard regimen in a randomized 2:1 ratio. Patients receiving Abecma went through leukapheresis, bridged one cycle of therapy, lymphodepleting chemotherapy (LDC), and a one-time Abecma infusion (175 to 529 x 10^6 CAR-positive T cells. Patients receiving the standard regimen received an investigator's choice with continuous treatment until disease progressed. Crossover to Abecma was allowed after confirmed progressive disease (56% rate).

PRIMARY ENDPOINT: Progression-free survival
SELECT SECONDARY ENDPOINTS: ORR, TTR, DOR, detection of MRD, safety
EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Creatinine clearance of <45 mL/min; aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase >2.5 times upper limit of normal; left ventricular ejection fraction <45%; absolute neutrophil count <1000/μL; platelet count <75,000/μL (if plasma cells <50% of bone marrow nucleated cells); or platelet count <50,000/μL (if plasma cells ≥50% of bone marrow nucleated cells)

  • KarMMa-3 was a phase 3, open-label, randomized, multicenter trial that evaluated ABECMA vs standard regimens in 386 triple-class exposed* patients with RRMM
  • Standard regimens were selected based on regulatory approval status and required patient involvement

*Patients who have received an immunomodulatory agent, a PI, and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody.2
Five (2%) patients did not receive leukapheresis due to patient withdrawal (n=2), adverse event (n=1) or failure to meet lymphodepleting chemotherapy treatment criteria (n=2). Twenty-four (10%) patients did not receive ABECMA either due to death (n=4), adverse event (n=4), physician decision (n=7), failure to meet LDC treatment criteria (n=6), or inability to manufacture product (n=3). Three (1.2%) patients received CAR-positive T cells that did not meet product release specifications for ABECMA (non-conforming product; n=3).
Up to 1 cycle of DPd, DVd, IRd, Kd, or EPd bridging therapy, dependent on the patient’s most recent antimyeloma treatment regimen, was permitted for disease control between apheresis and until 14 days before the start of LDC.
§LDC regimen: cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) and fludarabine 30 mg/m2 IV for 3 days (starting 5 days prior to target infusion date of ABECMA).
||At time of final PFS analysis.
As determined by IRC based on the IMWG Uniform Response Criteria for Multiple Myeloma.

CAR=chimeric antigen receptor; DOR=duration of response; DPd=daratumumab, pomalidomide, dexamethasone; DVd=daratumumab, bortezomib, dexamethasone; EPd=elotuzumab, pomalidomide, dexamethasone; IMWG=International Myeloma Working Group; IRC=Independent Review Committee; IRd=ixazomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone; Kd=carfilzomib, dexamethasone; LDC=lymphodepleting chemotherapy; MRD=minimal residual disease; ORR=overall response rate; PI=proteasome inhibitor; RRMM=relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma; TTR=time to response.

Learn more about the
efficacy and safety of ABECMA

Start the ABECMA process faster
than ever—find a certified
treatment center near you

References:

1. Rodriguez-Otero P, Ailawadhi S, Arnulf B, et al. Ide-cel or standard regimens in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(11):1002-1014. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2213614 2. ABECMA [package insert]. Summit, NJ: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; June 2025. 3. Isbary G, Staab TR, Amelung VE, et al. Effect of crossover in oncology clinical trials on evidence levels in early benefit assessment in Germany. Value Health. 2018;21(6):698-706. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2017.09.010




Legal Notice  |  Privacy Policy  |  Your Privacy Choices  |  Site Map  |  Contact Us  


© 2026 Bristol-Myers Squibb Company.
ABECMA, Cell Therapy 360, and the related logos are trademarks of Celgene Corporation, a Bristol Myers Squibb company. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. 2012-US-2500247 03/26